Book Review: The Men Who Lost America: British Leadership, the American Revolution, and the Fate of the Empire

The Men Who Lost America: British Leadership, the American Revolution, and the Fate of the Empire

by Andrew Jackson O’Shaughnessy

In the years that I have spent studying the American Revolution I thought I had found everything I needed to find. I could write a narrative that started with the French & Indian War and continue through to the election of President Washington without so much as batting an eye. Then I came across this book and found out that I had only just begun the story. It’s easy to read about the people you know. We are taught about the Revolution as kids but quickly, almost as if the school system has somewhere else it needs to be.  because of this quick overview, which leads into high school and even college level history the surface is barely scratched.

We know the name Cornwallis, maybe Gage and Howe. Clinton and possibly Burgoyne and Tarleton (or Tavington if you saw The Patriot). Basically we know names because they were the opponents of our chosen side and why should we spend time learning about the men that were on the losing side?

This book is one of several that I have come across that presents the struggle for America from the other side of the coin. It gets into British politics and how the fighting in America effected events back in England. It deals with the men who wore the red coats and what it was like to them to be fighting a war thousands of miles away from home that seemed to drag on forever. We also see how very few people in the British side knew who to deal with the Americans and the disdain that would eventually turn into a begrudging respect.

The author tells their story well and lays out the period in a way that makes you realize that there are in indeed two sides to every story. There are also lessons here that would have served the United States in its later conflicts has they chosen to pay attention to their own history (cough, cough Vietnam, cough cough).

Well written, meticulously researched and honest about the men that had the task of taming a rebellious people, and who failed. This book is highly recommended and could add depth to your knowledge of the American Revolution. as always clicking on the cover above will take you to the page where you can get yourself a copy!

The Final Treachery of Charles Lee

Charles Lee Esq'r. - Americanischer general-major.jpg
Illus. in: Geschichte der kriege in und ausser Europa / Christoph Heinrich Korn. Nürnberg : G.N. Raspe, 1776-84, p. 92 (Copy 2)

The picture above is of Charles Lee, a British subject who served in the British Army, served in the Polish Army and The Portuguese Army, he also served as George Washington’s Second-In Command in the Continental Army. He resume was incredible, yet he lacked tact and decorum and took many actions during his career that can best be described as “looking out for himself”.

In regards to the American Revolution he is rarely given the coverage that he deserves. He left Britain after having burned several bridges and basically destroying his chance for further promotion and found himself in America just as the conflict with Britain was starting to come to blows. He was a rabid patriot, and is well documented among the first to call for independence. He supported the cause full on and when the arguing turned to open warfare he expected to be called on to lead the American armies against the British invaders. As far as resumes go he was the most experienced patriot officer, he had fought and led men in several wars and all things considered he may have been a good choice, but the Congress went George Washington, and Lee never forgave any of them.

As talented as Lee was on the battlefield he was very thin-skinned and this led him into many difficulties in the early part of the war. He was instrumental in several early battles and as his star rose on the horizon he truly felt that he should be in charge and thus began a campaign to criticizes and undermine General Washington at every turn. Even to the point of purposefully delaying carrying out his orders and at time straight up ignoring them. There is much to go into with Lee and this subject but there is one instance in particular that needs looked at.

On December 13, 1776 Lee was captured by the British and taken to New York as a prisoner. Being an aristocrat as well as a highly valued political prisoner he did not suffer as enlisted men or common soldiers would have, During his captivity he enjoyed the company of many high-ranking British officers, many that he had even served with just years before. Late night dinners and audiences with the British Commander General Howe became par for the course, often when the topic of the ongoing war would come up Lee would share his thoughts on what he would be doing different. While he enjoyed the company he was still a prisoner and complications in the prisoner exchange system frustrated him to end. He blamed everyone from Congress to Washing for his imprisonment. It would not be until May of 1777 that he was freed and rejoined the Continental Army.

What happened next is well documented. In June Lee was tasked with leading an advanced corps against the British rearguard at Monmouth New Jersey. One thing led to another, Lee’s men retreated, Washington was upset, Lee was fired and ended up never serving in the Continental Army again. (yes, a vast over simplification for sure.)

In 1858 a document titled “Mr. Lee’s Plan, 29th March 1777” was found and verified as authentic. This document, written by Lee and addressed to General Howe, laid out a series of military strategies that lee suggested could be used to defeat the Americans and bring them back into the fold. Some believe this was an attempt by Lee to
plant false information for Howe, but most see it for what it was Lee, frustrated that he was not in command, frustrated by the slowness of his exchange, upset at not getting the praise he felt he deserved, turned coat and became one of the most notorious traitors of the American Revolution. The British did not follow his plan, had they perhaps many things would be different. But in a world where Benedict Arnold is synonymous with traitor, Charles Lee should be sharing the same moniker.

300 Posts!!!!

 

Instead of the regular Wednesday Words & Phrases post, this one will be a thank you. See this post, right here is #300. Yes, over the years I have managed to keep up a fairly good pace and turned out 300 unique and individual posts.

So first I want to thank everyone who takes the time each week to sift through all your notifications and decide to spend a few moments with Historia Militaris. I hope it has been as fun for you as it has been for me.

Thanks also to my family who has been patient with me as I obsess over getting the posts queued up for the week. Though I do all the writing this is truly a group effort.

What lies ahead for the blog? Well, there are a few things in the works but nothing quite ready for prime time yet. I will admit, #300 snuck up on me a bit or else we would have had a party or something.

This will be the last post for the week, but next Tuesday we will be hitting it hard again and start cranking them out towards another 300!

You know, that reminds me of a story…

 

Too Tents

During the Civil War, shelter was one of the main concerns for the troops. Rain, cold, heat, any of the elements were just as deadly to the army as the guns of the enemy. The most basic level of shelter for the soldiers was the cotton tent.

For ease of transport the standard issue tent came in two halves with poles so that each man would be responsible for his half of the tent. Designed to be connected at the top, either through grommets or snaps, they would come with other options such as A-frames and front and back pieces.

The half tent in the picture belonged to a union soldier who took the time to inscribe his half of the tent with the battles and campaigns that he had participated in. He saw a lot of action and took part in most of the major engagements of the Atlanta campaign and looks to have actually been used during Sherman’s March to the Sea.

A Simple Letter

Though the focus of the blog is US Military History, some times you run across little pieces of history that just need to be called out. In this case, the letter above is the actual resignation letter that President Richard Nixon sent to the Secretary of State, thus ending his tenure as President.

Even today the actions of President Nixon that lead to the resignation are polarizing. Many how lived during the time saw him as the face of government corruption, a man who used his station to try to cover up illegal acts committed by people on his staff. To others he was a man who tried his best to protect people in his employ that did something stupid.

In the days after Nixon resigned faith in the government stayed at an all time low, and no one really paid the price for that more the Gerald Ford, who didn’t help that general feeling much when he pardoned Nixon of the crimes he was accused of. Many believe that Ford paid the price in the 1976 election that he lost to Jimmy Carter.

As fascinating as it is, over forty years later, that trust in government has never really been rebuilt and for the most part we have had a number of men sit in the White House that have committed even worse offensives than what Nixon did. (At this point you can start rattling off offenses as you see fit, I am not getting into that.) As we look at the political divisions of the country today it seems you can draw a line from here all the way back to that letter above.

Douglas and Lincoln

In the contest for the Illinois Senate in 1858 Stephen A Douglas and Abraham Lincoln faced off in a series of seven debates that went on to become probably the most famous debates in history. At the heart of the debates was the question of the expansion of slavery in the territories of the  United States. Douglas, a Democrat, espoused the idea of Popular Sovereignty. Under this plan the people of the territories would decide themselves if they would form in Free or Slave states. Lincoln, a Republican, stood firm against any expansion of the peculiar institution. These debates, though only for a state seat, would soon become a national phenomenon as both sides followed them intensely.

The issue of what to do about slavery in the United States had been haunting the country since its very founding. Was it protected by the Constitution? Could the courts decide the issue? Would the growing divide between the sections of the country develop into an irreconcilable split? Time and time again the question was kicked down the road by the government by a series of compromises that were intended to keep the balance of power between Free and Slave states.

The debates between Lincoln and Douglas did not start the Civil War, the country was already well on that path. What they did do was set the stage for what would be the last gasp of the attempts to resolve the issue peaceably. Douglas won the debates and his re-election to the Senate. In the process though, because he equivocated on the issue lost the support of the Southern Democrats which would lead to his failed presidential run a few years later. Lincoln lost the debates, but enjoyed an increased national profile that would lead him to win the next presidential election.

And that led directly to the Civil War…

Hot Racking

Ah the US Navy. So many young people join up expecting to see the word, new and exotic places and people. However there may be something left out of most of the “travel brochures.” In the photo above you see racks, also known as bunks from a US Navy warship, in this an aircraft carrier.  Three beds in a fairly small space. See during you time stationed aboard the ships that tiny space is your home and your personal space. The beds lift for storage for your personal items and you have the little curtains, so maybe not so bad right?

Maybe.

Or maybe not.

See on some ships, smaller ones for sure, submarines for certain, that bed you see. Well, odds are good you share that with at least one, maybe two other people. Not at the same time of course.

It is called hot racking (or hot bunking) and it is the process where multiple people share a single berth. While one person is on watch (working) someone is sleeping in the bed. When when the shift is over the one returns to the rack that is probably still warm from the person that just got up to go and enjoy their day of work. Wash, rinse repeat, for six months. Yes, that also means that you could be sharing a bed with someone who you have never actually met. What would your mother say?

Don’t feel bad though. They do the same sort of things in prisons sometimes.

 

Wednesday Words & Phrases: Yacht

Image result for yacht

Yacht

As in “Buffy and I took the yacht out to the island this morning.”

A yacht is a type of light water craft that wayyyy back in the day was favored by pirates.  Small and quick they were perfect for coastal raiding and quick strikes at sea. The name comes from the Dutch word jachten  which means “to hunt”.

in 1660 Holland presented the English King Charles II with a yacht named Mary. It was 100 tons, carried eight cannon and was given to celebrate the restoration of the English monarchy. It was at the precise time that the word entered the English language. There are not many times when you can actually point to the exact entrance of such a word, that alone makes it kind of cool. The pirate connection adds a little also and provides the military connection. Hmmm… makes you wonder what the Minnow was really doing on that three hour tour…

Those Who Remained Loyal

The American Revolution was much more of a civil war than a revolution. Though the patriot struggle focused on the problems with Parliament and the King, it brought them also to odds against their neighbors and family members. When most people think about the war they imagine a sharp dressed British army invading the colonies and spreading havoc. Those that may know a little more can also picture the German troops that fought on behalf of the British. Most people however don’t think about how many “Americans” fought against the revolution.

John Adams, later in life,  said (paraphrasing) that about a third of the country supported the patriot cause and about a third remained loyal to Britain. Approximately 19,000 men answered advertisements like the one shown above and actually fought as a part of the British Army during the war. That does not take into account loyalists militias, partisans, or those that swapped sides at some point. As far as civilians that remained loyal the number was between 200,000 and 500,000 thousand out of a population of about 3 million. A fairly wide gap, but accounts differ.

There were many reasons that men joined the British Army instead of the American cause. Many remained loyal to the king, they saw themselves as Englishmen and those that called themselves patriots were just thugs looking to enrich themselves. Some were men that became disillusioned with the cause and thought they would be on the winning side if they switched. There were some that were captured and given the choice to join the British Army, or face an almost certain death on the prison ships in New York Harbor. Some looked to settle old scores with neighbors that came down on the other side of the conflict. Their stories are wide and varied and just like their patriot counterparts they had their reasons.

Unfortunately the civil war aspect of the revolution lead to some of the most brutal and viscous fighting, especially in the South. Nothing that the Red Coats or Hessians or heck even he Native Americans, could do that would match any of the brutality of the backwoods of the Carolinas.

After the war the Loyalists found themselves out in the cold. Many of them no longer had homes as their property had been confiscated and for the most part they were just not wanted. Almost 100,000 of them left the country and resettled Newfoundland, Canada, or simply went back to England. Those who stayed faced discrimination and sometimes violence, for a while. Eventually the wounds faded and those that stayed became part of the fabric of the brand new country.

Movie Review: Glory

Glory  (Mastered in 4K) (Single-Disc Blu-ray + Ultra Violet Digital Copy)

Glory

No list of Civil War movies is complete with out Glory. Few would argue that it is one of the best of the genre, even if the history is a little loosey goosey. The actors are all A List and put everything they had into their roles.

Glory tells the story of the 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry, one of the first all black Union regiments of the Civil War. Made up of freemen and runaways this group of people wanted a chance to fight for their beliefs. This at a time when it was assumed that all men of color were cowards who would run rather than fight when the time came. Up to this point these men were simply used as manual labor by the army. That rarely changed when they started to wear the uniform. Commanded by white officers their lot didn’t really change that much. The 54th was very lucky that the man chosen to lead them, Robert Gould Shaw, saw them their brave souls.

Matthew Broderick has had many unforgettable roles in his life, but as Shaw he helped to bring to life a unique person at a unique time. With such heavy weights as Morgan Freeman, Denzel Washington and Carey Elewes (yes, I put him up there!) the story is expertly brought to life and even when i saw it twenty years ago made me want to learn more about this unit and these men.

So yes, one of the best Civil War movies, but also one with very few actual battle scenes. This only adds to the fabric of the movie. You as the viewer had the chance to build up the same anticipation as the members of the 54th. Both wanting to see the action and both in awe when the big battle finally dawns. The final battle at Ft. Wagner is one of the most visceral and heartbreaking scenes of any military movie. I would say spoilers, but, c’mon we all know how the war ends.

If you have not seen it, watch it. If you have not seen it in a while, watch it again. It holds up and should be held up.

 

As always, clicking on the image will take you to Amazon where you can buy this fantastic movie.

People, Places and Things from US Military History

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
error: Content is protected !!